OUR RENAISSANCE
OUR AMERICAN RENAISSANCE
Congress is broken – and The People can fix it!
We have a legal and peaceful plan to reclaim the power of the people to create
the best government money can't buy!
Our Renaissance is a foundation created to promote discussions – and help the people reclaim their right to self-governance through the legal and peaceful process that has always existed – and it is right there in Article V of the Constitution.
Most people use the process every day in their personal, professional and public lives without even knowing it and it is the essence of the American legislative process.
The process is simple – Discuss to Agree and Do – D.A.D.
Discussion is a powerful process. When used correctly, it can foster communication and lead to understanding and agreement, resulting in positive action.
Without discussion, there can be no exchange of ideas, no real meeting of the minds to act together to achieve common goals.
We see this almost daily in the polarization and gridlock evident in Congress.
When the Constitution created Congress, the people who wrote and adopted it specifically recognized that all power comes from the people and our Constitution provides a role for the people – through their state legislatures and the amending process – to discuss, to agree and most importantly – to act!
Article V of the Constitution lays out two methods to propose amendments. First, Congress itself can propose amendments any time two-thirds of both Houses agree.
Second, Congress must call a convention for the states to propose amendments if two-thirds of the states submit applications requesting that it do so.
Congress has the duty to count the applications and call a convention when the required number (currently 34) of the states have applied. It has no authority to debate or limit the count based upon subject matter. It can only count and make a call.
Congress has taken control of both methods to propose by denying, delaying and ignoring the states’ applications rather than obeying the clear and unambiguous language of Article V to call a convention.
Although 49 States have submitted hundreds of applications, Congress has never called a convention, so the states have never been allowed to propose one single amendment.
On the other hand, in the almost 250 years since the founding, over 11,000 amendments have been offered by Congress; only 27 have been adopted.
In this way, Congress has kept the power to propose for itself – and it is not letting go. There is simply no incentive for Congress to relinquish its control over the people’s power to amend.
Those who control the amendment process control the Constitution – and Congress knows it!
Congress also controls the method of ratification. A properly proposed amendment requires ratification by 38 states either by their state legislatures or their state ratification conventions, as determined by Congress.
So far, Congress has used ratification by state legislatures 26 times for the 27 amendments that were adopted. In this way, Congress has failed to honor our right of self-governance by excluding the states and the people from exercising their right to amend.
In the United States, the power of the government has always come from the governed – The People – and it’s time we reclaimed that power and used it as intended.

RENAISSANCE ~ a rebirth, a renewal, revival of interest
RECLAIM ~ to take back what was rightfully yours
RESTORE ~ to bring back a previous right
RENEW ~ to resume after an interruption with new life
REBOOT ~ to restart with new energy
AND so it began... April 19, 1775... Lexington and Concord – The Shot Heard Round The World
Spring 1776... the war with the British continues without a formal declaration...
WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF POWER IN OUR AMERICAN GOVERNMENT?
A. The President
B. The Congress
C. The Supreme Court
D. The People
LEARN MORE...
A sentence to explain...
TITLE OF RAPPAPORT ARTICLE
Professor Rappaport provides an examination of why the constitutional amendment procedure in Article V is defective.
The requirement for Congressional approval prior to the adoption of an amendment, as well as uncertainties within the process prevent it from being used as originally intended.
Could a revision that eliminates the control of Congress create a greater role for the people acting through their states in the amending process?
Michael B. Rappaport is a Professor of Law at the University of San Diego School of Law, where he also serves as the Director of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism. He is also a Visiting Fellow at the Hoover Institution.
CONGRESS.GOV
Article V establishes two methods for amending the Constitution. This discussion examines just a few of the questions and uncertainties regarding one of them – a convention of the states for proposing amendments upon the request of two-thirds of the state legislatures. This method has never been used. Why not?
MINNESOTA TITLE
About This Publication: This was prepared for state legislators and staff by the non-partisan Research Department of the Minnesota House of Representatives as a reference guide to applicable law related to amending the U.S. Constitution.
1787 Article
A foundational understanding of how the need to reform the Articles of Confederation led to the convention in Philadelphia during the summer of 1787 and the writing – and adoption – of the Constitution.

ABOUT OUR RENAISSANCE...
ABOUT ROBIN K. HULT... About Robin Hult Our Renaissance Foundation, Founding Director Responsible for the foundation’s overall concept and educational purposeFor decades I have been a Certified Public Accountant, tax advisor and an expert in proving tens of millions of dollars in economic damages for injured parties throughout the United States. My job is to know the law, identify the best strategic outcomes for my clients, and then coach them in how to best achieve their agreed-upon goals. My professional experience has taught me that discussion is crucial for agreement and agreement leads to getting things done. I consistently prove knowledge is power and that goals are best achieved by the process of Discussing to Agree and Do. (D.A.D.) Following graduation with a B.S. in Business with honors (cum laude) from the University of Colorado, I spent 5 years attending evening classes of the University of Denver, Sturm College of Law Master of Taxation Program while gaining three years of experience and training at PricewaterhouseCoopers, a “Big Four” international accounting and consulting firm. Since 1990, I have been providing highly personalized investment, tax and financial consulting to individuals, small businesses and publicly traded corporations and their owners. I am the founding shareholder of Hult CPA Firm PC, in Boulder, Colorado and have held professional licenses in the real estate, insurance and securities industries. I was previously married for 25 years and have two adult sons. I have had a lot of fun playing and coaching recreational football and basketball for most of my life and sports have taught me the valuable life lessons of preparation, discipline and teamwork. Currently, my passion is working toward an American Renaissance where all just powers of government come from the consent of the people and to restore the balance of power between the state and federal governments as first envisioned at our founding. I have had a wonderful and rewarding life, and at this point my passion is working toward an American Renaissance to restore the balance of power between the people and their government first envisioned at our founding, which is our American birthright.

PLACEHOLDER FOR IMAGE
ABOUT Melissa Davis...
Our Renaissance has applied for a 501(c)(3) designation from the IRS which provides for tax-free status for donations to charitable and educational organizations. The process is lengthy and expensive, but will allow all donations to be tax free to the donor – even retroactively.